AFE5828ZAV vs AFE5803ZCF

對 AFE5828ZAV 和 AFE5803ZCF 的深入比較,為您帶來關於其規格和關鍵特性的寶貴見解。我們詳細介紹了重要因素,包括 RoHS 合規性、REACH 狀態、系列、安裝方式、封裝類型以及其他相關特性。並排展示差異,簡化了元件選擇,讓您更輕鬆地為您的特定應用選擇最佳方案。

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Compatible functional replacement candidate

The AFE5828ZAV and AFE5803ZCF are both octal-channel ultrasound analog front ends with integrated continuous-wave Doppler capability, but they differ in package footprint, channel-count scalability, and power/interface configuration. The AFE5828ZAV is a viable functional candidate for the AFE5803ZCF only after validating package compatibility, clocking, and power-supply requirements against the target design.

Channel Count Validation required
Package Type Not compatible
Power Supply Configuration Validation required
Signal Chain Function High match

Parts at a glance

Part A

AFE5828ZAV

德州儀器

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
3880 件
Package
NFBGA-289
Series
資料獲取-類比前端(AFE)

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter AFE5828ZAV AFE5803ZCF Why it matters
Number of Channels 8 8 Channel count determines how many transducer elements can be processed simultaneously in an ultrasound system.
ADC Resolution 14 bit 12 bit Higher ADC resolution improves dynamic range and image quality in ultrasound signal chains.
Maximum Sampling Rate 65 MSPS 65 MSPS Sampling rate sets the maximum signal bandwidth the AFE can digitize for a given application.
LNA Gain Range 18 dB to 34 dB 18 dB to 34 dB Low-noise amplifier gain range affects sensitivity and the ability to handle weak echo signals.
Total Power Consumption Approximately 1.1 W Approximately 1.0 W Power consumption impacts thermal design and battery life in portable ultrasound systems.
Package Type NFBGA (ZAV) NFBGA (ZCF) Package footprint and pinout determine PCB layout compatibility and drop-in substitutability.
Operating Temperature Range -40°C to +85°C -40°C to +85°C Temperature range ensures reliable operation across industrial and medical environments.
Supply Voltage 1.8 V / 3.3 V 1.8 V / 3.3 V Supply voltage compatibility determines whether the device can share existing power rails on a board.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification AFE5828ZAV AFE5803ZCF
Supplier - Rochester Electronics, LLC,Texas Instruments
Part Status Active Active
Number of Bits - 14
Number of Channels - 8
Power (Watts) - 190 mW
Voltage - Supply, Analog - 1.7V ~ 1.9V, 3.15V ~ 3.6V, 5V
Voltage - Supply, Digital - 1.7V ~ 1.9V
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount

Frequently asked questions

What are the AFE5828ZAV and AFE5803ZCF?

The AFE5828ZAV is an 8-channel fully integrated analog front end (AFE) for ultrasound from Texas Instruments, and the AFE5803ZCF is a fully integrated 8-channel AFE for ultrasound also from Texas Instruments. Both integrate a low-noise amplifier (LNA), voltage-controlled attenuator (VCA), programmable gain amplifier (PGA), and analog-to-digital converter (ADC) per channel.

How do the channel counts and package types compare between the AFE5828ZAV and AFE5803ZCF?

Both devices are 8-channel AFEs. The AFE5828ZAV is supplied in a ZAV package (a 289-ball NFBGA), while the AFE5803ZCF is supplied in a ZCF package (a 135-ball NFBGA). The different package footprints and ball counts mean the two are not drop-in replacements for each other.

What are the key differences in ADC resolution and sampling rate between the AFE5828ZAV and AFE5803ZCF?

The AFE5828ZAV integrates a 14-bit ADC with a maximum sampling rate of 65 MSPS. The AFE5803ZCF integrates a 14-bit ADC with a maximum sampling rate of 65 MSPS as well. Both target similar ultrasound signal-chain bandwidths, so selection depends on other system-level factors such as package, power, and channel density.

Do the AFE5828ZAV and AFE5803ZCF have the same power consumption?

They are not identical in power. The AFE5828ZAV is specified at approximately 158 mW per channel (typical), while the AFE5803ZCF is specified at approximately 101 mW per channel (typical). Designers should confirm the exact test conditions in the respective datasheets, since power scales with sampling rate and gain settings.

Can the AFE5828ZAV and AFE5803ZCF be used interchangeably in an existing PCB design?

No. The two devices use different packages (289-ball ZAV vs 135-ball ZCF), different ball maps, and different pin counts, so they are not footprint-compatible. A direct substitution would require a PCB redesign and full revalidation against the target system requirements.

What input signal range and LNA gain options do these AFEs support?

Both the AFE5828ZAV and AFE5803ZCF include a low-noise amplifier with selectable gain settings and a voltage-controlled attenuator for time-gain compensation in ultrasound receive chains. Exact LNA gain steps, input-referred noise, and attenuation range should be taken from the respective TI datasheets, as these parameters differ between the two parts.

Which device is better suited for lower-power portable ultrasound designs?

Based on published typical per-channel power, the AFE5803ZCF (approximately 101 mW per channel) consumes less power than the AFE5828ZAV (approximately 158 mW per channel), making the AFE5803ZCF generally more attractive for power-sensitive portable ultrasound systems, provided its package and channel configuration meet the design requirements.