AD8052ARZ vs AD8054AR

對 AD8052ARZ 和 AD8054AR 的深入比較,為您帶來關於其規格和關鍵特性的寶貴見解。我們詳細介紹了重要因素,包括 RoHS 合規性、REACH 狀態、系列、安裝方式、封裝類型以及其他相關特性。並排展示差異,簡化了元件選擇,讓您更輕鬆地為您的特定應用選擇最佳方案。

Technical review by ETEI Component Engineering Source: manufacturer documentation

Replacement verdict

Compatible functional replacement candidate

The AD8052ARZ and AD8054AR are both high-speed voltage-feedback operational amplifiers from the same Analog Devices AD805x family, sharing identical supply voltage ranges, bandwidth class, and SOIC package style. The primary distinction is channel count: the AD8052ARZ is a dual-channel device while the AD8054AR is a quad-channel device. For designs where board space and channel count permit substitution, the AD8054AR can serve as a functional replacement candidate, but the difference in channel count and package footprint must be validated against the target application before committing to a drop-in replacement.

Channel Count Validation required
Supply Voltage Range High match
Amplifier Architecture High match
Package Footprint Validation required

Parts at a glance

Part A

AD8052ARZ

ADI公司

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
5439 件
Package
SOIC-8
Series
線性放大器-儀器、運算放大器、緩衝放大器
Part B

AD8054AR

ADI公司

Lifecycle
Active
Stock
8951 件
Package
SOIC-14
Series
線性放大器-儀器、運算放大器、緩衝放大器

Key differences

Rows are prioritized by design impact. Highlighted values require attention during substitution.

Key electrical and mechanical differences between the two devices

Parameter AD8052ARZ AD8054AR Why it matters
Number of Amplifiers 2 4 Determines how many independent signal channels can be processed in one package; a dual vs quad affects board layout and channel count.
Gain Bandwidth Product 80 MHz 80 MHz Sets the maximum frequency at which the amplifier can provide useful gain; matching values means similar high-frequency capability.
Slew Rate 140 V/µs 140 V/µs Governs how fast the output can respond to large signal changes; identical slew rates indicate comparable large-signal dynamic performance.
Supply Voltage Range 3 V to 12 V 3 V to 12 V Defines the allowable power supply window; matching ranges allow the same supply rail design for both parts.
Input Offset Voltage (max) 5 mV 5 mV Affects DC accuracy; equal offset specs mean similar precision in DC-coupled applications.
Input Bias Current 1.4 µA 1.4 µA Influences error in high-impedance circuits; identical bias currents give comparable input loading behavior.
Quiescent Supply Current per Amplifier 5.5 mA 5.5 mA Determines power consumption; per-amplifier current is similar, but total package current scales with the number of amplifiers.
Package Type 8-Lead SOIC 14-Lead SOIC Footprint and pin count differ, so the PCB layout must be redesigned when substituting one for the other.
Operating Temperature Range -40 °C to +125 °C -40 °C to +125 °C Confirms both parts are rated for the same environmental conditions, supporting use in similar industrial applications.

Need help validating a replacement?

Send your BOM and application constraints for technical and sourcing review.

Full specification comparison

Use manufacturer datasheets as the final authority.

Specification AD8052ARZ AD8054AR
Supplier - Rochester Electronics, LLC,Analog Devices Inc.
Part Status Active Obsolete
Amplifier Type Voltage Feedback Voltage Feedback
Number of Circuits 2 4
Output Type Rail-to-Rail Rail-to-Rail
Slew Rate 170V/µs 190V/µs
-3 dB Bandwidth 110 MHz 160 MHz
Current - Input Bias 1.4 µA 2 µA
Voltage - Input Offset 1.7 mV 1.8 mV
Supply Current 4.8mA (x2 Channels) 2.875mA (x4 Channels)
Current - Output / Channel 45 mA 30 mA
Voltage - Supply Span(Min) 3 V 3 V
Voltage - Supply Span(Max) 12 V 12 V
Operating Temperature -40°C ~ 125°C -40°C ~ 125°C
Mounting Type Surface Mount Surface Mount

Frequently asked questions

What are the key differences between the AD8052ARZ and AD8054AR?

The AD8052ARZ is a dual, voltage-feedback operational amplifier supplied in an 8-lead SOIC package, while the AD8054AR is a quad, voltage-feedback operational amplifier supplied in a 14-lead SOIC package. Both are fabricated on the same high-speed complementary bipolar process and share similar per-amplifier AC and DC performance, but they differ in channel count, package pinout, and total quiescent current.

Are the AD8052ARZ and AD8054AR pin-compatible?

No. The AD8052ARZ uses an 8-lead SOIC (R-8) package with two amplifiers, and the AD8054AR uses a 14-lead SOIC (R-14) package with four amplifiers. The pin counts, pin assignments, and PCB land patterns differ, so they are not drop-in replacements for one another.

Do the AD8052ARZ and AD8054AR have the same bandwidth and slew rate specifications?

Yes, per-amplifier AC specifications are essentially the same. Both devices are specified with a -3 dB bandwidth of 145 MHz (G = +1) and a slew rate of 170 V/µs, reflecting their common high-speed complementary bipolar process and voltage-feedback architecture.

How does the supply current compare between the AD8052ARZ and AD8054AR?

The AD8052ARZ (dual) is specified with a total supply current of approximately 5.5 mA typical at ±5 V, while the AD8054AR (quad) is specified with a total supply current of approximately 11 mA typical at ±5 V. The quad device draws roughly twice the total quiescent current because it contains twice as many amplifiers, with similar per-amplifier current.

What are the input voltage range and output swing characteristics of these amplifiers?

Both the AD8052ARZ and AD8054AR are specified for operation on dual supplies of ±5 V (or single supply of 5 V to 12 V) with an input common-mode voltage range that extends from approximately -4.0 V to +4.0 V on ±5 V supplies. Their rail-to-rail output stage swings to within approximately 1 V of each supply rail under rated load conditions.

Can the AD8052ARZ and AD8054AR be used in single-supply applications?

Yes. Both devices are specified for single-supply operation over a range of 5 V to 12 V, in addition to dual-supply operation of ±2.5 V to ±6 V. Their input common-mode range and output swing support single-supply signal chains, provided the input and output headroom limits are respected in the design.

Which device should be selected for a design requiring four high-speed amplifiers in the smallest board area?

The AD8054AR is the appropriate choice when four amplifiers are required, since it integrates four channels in a single 14-lead SOIC package and avoids the board area and component count of two AD8052ARZ dual packages. If only two channels are needed, the AD8052ARZ provides the same per-amplifier performance in a smaller 8-lead SOIC package.